Hmm, but even without such a conversion in PI, it should still be less effort to do the replacement already in PI? (After all: things like this should be what PI and its mapping engine are there for...)
If all else fails, one could simply create a little Hashmap and fill it with the "pairs" that can occur in your scenario (will at most be 256... Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
), and then in a mapping at runtime lookup the current value from the Hashmap?!
Best Regards, Ulrich
